04664cam a22004338i 450000100090000000300040000900500170001300600190003000700150004900800410006401000170010502000260012202000300014802000310017803500130020904000230022204200080024504300120025305000220026508200190028713000360030624501210034226300090046326400890047230000220056133600260058333700260060933800360063549000290067150400510070050516880075152013370243958300410377658801030381765000460392065000430396670000330400977601880404221226796OSt20260717112653.0m    |o  d |      cr |||||||||||190920s2020    nyu     ob    001 0 eng    a  2019042608  a9781108556989q(epub)  z9781108471701q(hardback)  z9781108458337q(paperback)  a21226796  aDLCbengcDLCerda  apcc  an-us---00aKF505b..F46 202000a346.7301/52230 aFeminist judgments (Family law)10aFeminist judgments :bfamily law opinions rewritten /cedited by Rachel Rebouché, Temple University, Philadelphia.  a2003 1aCambridge, United Kingdom ;aNew York, NY, USA :bCambridge University Press,c2020.  a1 online resource  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier0 aFeminist judgment series  aIncludes bibliographical references and index.0 aIntroduction / Rachel Rebouché, -- Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) / Commentary: Marie Failinger; Judgment: Laura Kessler -- McGuire v. McGuire, 59 N.W.2d 336 (Neb. 1953) / Commentary: Mary Anne Case; Judgment: Martha Ertman,  Zvi Triger -- Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970) / Commentary: Maya Manian; Judgment: Susan Frelich Appleton -- Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) / Commentary: Lisa Fishbayn Joffe; Judgment: Kristen Murray -- Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P.2d 106 (Cal. 1976) / Commentary: Aníbal Rosario Lebrón ; ,Judgment: Kate Sablosky Elengold -- Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978) / Commentary: Mary-Beth Moylan; Judgment: Katherine Macfarlane -- Daly v. Daly, 715 P.2d 56 (Nev. 1986) / Commentary: Raff Donelson; Judgment: Nancy Polikoff -- Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989) / Commentary: Suzanne Kim; Judgment: Albertina Antognini -- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) / Commentary: Macarena Saez; Judgment: Jessica Dixon Weaver -- Simeone v. Simeone, 581 A.2d 162 (Pa. 1990) / Commentary: Jamie Abrams; Judgment: Alicia Kelly, John Culhane -- Borelli v. Brusseau, 12 Cal. App. 4th 647 (1993) / Commentary: June Carbone; Judgment: Jo Carrillo -- Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431 (2011) / Commentary: Warren Binford; Judgment: Elizabeth L. MacDowell -- In re T.J.S., 54 A.3d 263 (N.J. 2012) / Commentary: June Carbone; Judgment: Seema Mohapatra -- Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018) / Commentary: Natalie Nanasi; Judgment: Suzan M. Pritchett -- Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 2017 WL 2507339 (U.S. 2017) / Commentary: Cynthia Godsoe;  Judgment: Tracy Thomas.  a"Could a feminist perspective change the shape of the tax law? Most people understand that feminist reasoning has tremendous potential to affect, for example, the law of employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and reproductive rights. Few people may be aware, however, that feminist analysis can likewise transform tax law (as well as other statutory or code-based areas of the law). By highlighting the importance of perspective, background, and preconceptions on the reading and interpretation of statutes, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions shows what a difference feminist analysis can make to statutory interpretation. This volume, part of the Feminist Judgments Series, brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite tax decisions in which a feminist emphasis would have changed the outcome or the court's reasoning. The volume includes cases that implicate gender on their face (such as medical expense deductions for fertility treatment or gender confirmation surgery and special tax benefits for married individuals) as well as cases without an obvious connection to gender (such as the tax treatment of tribal lands and the business expense deduction). This book thus opens the way for a discussion of how viewpoint is a key factor in all statutory interpretation cases"--cProvided by publisher.  aCataloguing:c20260717kgtanuigtanui  aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed. 0aDomestic relationszUnited StatesxCases. 0aFeminist jurisprudencezUnited States.1 aRebouché, Rachel,eeditor.08iPrint version:aFeminist judgments (Family law)tFeminist judgmentsdCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2020.z9781108471701w(DLC) 2019042607