000			04704cam a22004698i 4500
001			21213150
003			OSt
005			20260717115740.0
008			190920s2020 nyu b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2019042485
020			_a9781108425438 _q(hardback)
020			_a9781108442350 _q(paperback)
020			_z9781108348409 _q(epub)
035			_a21213150
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC
042			_apcc
043			_an-us---
050	0	0	_aKF3760 _b.F46 2020
082	0	0	_a342.7308/4 _223
130	0		_aFeminist judgments (Reproductive justice)
245	1	0	_aFeminist judgments : _breproductive justice rewritten / _cedited by Kimberly M. Mutcherson, Rutgers University, New Jersey.
263			_a2003
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY, USA : _bCambridge University Press, _c2020.
300			_axxxiv, 371 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aFeminist judgment series
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aPart I . Kimberly M. Mutcherson. Introduction -- Using RJ to Rewrite Justice -- The Art of Storytelling -- Feminists, Feminist Theory, and Race -- The Clash of Rights and Justice -- Intertwining Identities and Movements. Part II. The Feminist Judgments. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) -- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) -- Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) -- Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) -- In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) -- Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) -- Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) -- State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) -- Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dept. of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 -- K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) -- Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. ---, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) -- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. (2014) -- Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. (2015) -- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
520			_a"American history is replete with examples of some people controlling reproduction to assert power and domination over others. During chattel slavery in the United States, slaveowners denied Black women and men the most basic forms of dignity---subjecting enslaved Black women to sexual abuse and rape at the whim of people who believed that they could own human beings as property. When pregnancies resulted from rape by slave owners or consensual relationships among slaves, enslaved women frequently watched their children taken from them and sold for profit. Control of fertility and parenting decisions too often meant self-induced abortion or infanticide because other tools were out of reach. Post-emancipation and well into the present day, the experiences of Black women and other women of color, as well as poor women and women living with disabilities, were a reminder that procreation remains a space of power and constraint. The eugenics movement in the United States led to thousands of unconsented sterilization procedures largely on women. Today, parents seek to consent to sterilization on behalf of their adult children living with disabilities. The myth of the welfare queen, always depicted as a poor Black woman with too many children, allowed states to create welfare caps that harm poor children by withholding needed financial resources from their families. States treat pregnant women and new mothers who are living with substance use disorder as criminals who need punishment, rather than sufferers who need a public health response. The federal government makes access to safe and legal abortion more difficult for poor women who are forbidden in almost all instances from using federal Medicaid dollars to pay for pregnancy terminations. It is fitting, then, that this entry into the Feminist Judgments canon focuses on procreation and parenting as sites of oppression and discrimination"-- _cProvided by publisher.
583			_aCataloguing: _c20260717 _kgtanuigtanui
650		0	_aHuman reproduction _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States _xCases.
650		0	_aAbortion _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States _xCases.
650		0	_aParent and child (Law) _zUnited States _xCases.
650		0	_aFeminist jurisprudence _zUnited States.
700	1		_aMutcherson, Kimberly M., _d1972- _eeditor.
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _tFeminist judgments (Reproductive justice). _dCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2020. _z9781108348409 _w(DLC) 2019042486
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK
999			_c21890 _d21889